tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5235419263414453422.post6139237374197796208..comments2024-02-23T01:30:06.101-08:00Comments on Early Warning: What is Waxman-Markey Really Doing?Stuart Stanifordhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07182839827506265860noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5235419263414453422.post-39270860878906083472010-04-16T10:34:20.472-07:002010-04-16T10:34:20.472-07:00Just in case folks don't know....the EIA publi...Just in case folks don't know....the EIA published <a href="http://www.eia.doe.gov/oiaf/servicerpt/hr2454/index.html" rel="nofollow"> an analysis of Waxman-Markey</a> on the request of bill's authors.Datamungerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10697373189192242333noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5235419263414453422.post-4753684326757489072010-04-16T10:27:50.690-07:002010-04-16T10:27:50.690-07:00The fantasy of CCS corrupts thinking. It prevents ...The fantasy of CCS corrupts thinking. It prevents people seeing the obvious fact that the place to tax carbon is as it comes out of the ground. You also need to tax it off the ship if it comes from a lower taxing place, and tax goods made in lower carbon tax countries. If CCS happens then the people doing that would get the tax money back. Taxing emissions is impossible because carbon cycles in and out of the atmosphere at a high rate.<br />Australia and America are big coal exporters. We should get together on this. Joke. No politician is taking on the coal industry in either country. It remains a fact that only energy cheaper than coal (once it's going) will stop coal: and that means nuclear.rkshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01183856757175002949noreply@blogger.com